WPS Editor Info and Attribution is a collaboration feature for viewing contributor details and content ownership markers; it includes 3 core tasks, with 3 available without membership and 0 membership-related items.
At a Glance
| Metric | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Core tasks | 3 | Matches the number of rows in the How-to Index |
| Available without membership | 3 | Matches the number of Free rows in the index |
| Membership-related items | 0 | Matches the number of membership-related rows in the index |
| Version limit | None stated | Available for direct use |
About This Feature
Overview
Editor Info and Attribution is a collaboration feature in smart documents that helps you view contributor share, last edit time, and content attribution markers by editor. When attribution markers are turned on, the document shows editor-specific underlines so you can identify who edited different parts of the content.
Core tasks include:
- View editor details: Check contributor share and last edit time in the editor list.
- Turn on attribution markers: Show editor underlines in the document to distinguish content ownership.
- Turn off attribution markers: Return to a cleaner reading view when markers are no longer needed.
This feature is useful for team review, multi-author content checks, and responsibility confirmation during document collaboration.
System Requirements
| Item | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Operating system | A Windows device that can run WPS Office and access online collaborative documents |
| App version | It is recommended to use the latest version of WPS Office |
| Network | An internet connection is required to load collaborator details and online document status |
| Other | Open a smart document with editing permission and stay signed in to your account |
Download & Installation
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Official download | WPS Office Free Download |
| Installation method | Download and install the WPS Office desktop app for Windows |
| Post-install check | Open an online collaborative document and confirm that the creator avatar or editor list entry is visible below the document title |
Source: WPS Download Center
Compare with Alternatives
| Dimension | WPS | Microsoft | Notion | Adobe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability Summary | Lets you open the editor list below the document title to view contributor share, last edit time, and turn editor attribution markers on or off. | Word uses Track Changes to show revisions from different authors in different colors and lets you filter changes by Specific People. | Google Docs shows Last edit, version history, and Show editors for selected content. | Notion provides Updates, Page history, and Created by / Last updated by properties to review page activity and editor information. | Acrobat mainly supports shared PDF review and comment tracking, rather than live document attribution markers. |
| WPS Advantages | Advantage: WPS combines contributor share, last edit time, and attribution marker switching in one workflow, which is convenient for quick multi-author review. | Compared with WPS: Word focuses more on revision review and reviewer filtering, without emphasizing contribution share in the same view. | Compared with WPS: Google Docs is stronger for selection-based editor lookup, and some editor-identification features depend on Google Workspace plans. | Compared with WPS: Notion is better suited to page update tracking and database properties than inline document attribution markers. | Compared with WPS: Acrobat is centered on PDF review workflows rather than direct attribution display in collaborative documents. |
| Official Source | — | Track changes in Word | Find what's changed in a file | Tips to keep your team’s Notion pages up to date | Manage shared files in Acrobat |
Overall Conclusion
WPS is a practical fit when you need to quickly check who contributed to a document and identify content ownership inside the document view. Compared with tools that focus more on revision review, version history, or PDF commenting, WPS offers a more direct attribution-checking workflow for collaborative writing.
Use Cases
| No. | Scenario | Suitable For | Main Pain Point | How WPS Helps |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Team collaboration review | Project teams, content teams | It is hard to tell who contributed most of the content | Use the editor list to review contribution share and last edit time |
| 2 | Content ownership check | Reviewers, team leads | Paragraph ownership is unclear | Turn on editor markers to identify attribution with underlines |
| 3 | Reading mode switch | General collaborators | Too many markers affect reading | Turn off editor markers to return to a cleaner reading view |
Membership & Benefits
Free vs WPS Premium
| Capability | Free Users | WPS Premium |
|---|---|---|
| View editor details | ✅ Available | ✅ Available |
| Turn attribution markers on or off | ✅ Available | ✅ Available |
| Basic PDF features | ✅ Available | ✅ More complete feature set |
| Cloud storage and templates | Basic quota | More storage and more template benefits |
| AI and advanced tools | Some limits apply | More advanced tools are available |
Source: WPS Office pricing page
Recommendations
| Usage Scenario | Recommended Plan | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Daily use of editor details and attribution markers | Free | This feature itself does not require membership |
| Need more PDF, template, cloud storage, or AI capabilities | WPS Premium | Better for users who also need broader advanced office features |
How to Subscribe
- WPS membership center: Subscribe now
- Official download page: Download WPS Office
Source: WPS Office pricing page